Marc's Public Blog - Flying


All | Aquariums | Arduino | Btrfs | Cars | Cats | Clubbing | Dining | Diving | Electronics | Exercising | Flying | Hiking | Linux | Linuxha | Public | Rc | Sciencemuseums | Snow | Solar | Trips

This is a collection of my blog entries and experiences with flying, and learning to fly. Something I had been wanting to do for quite a while.
You can find all the pictures I've taken here, and read below for my experience.
Specifically, I have a page for my Trips to Oshkosh, the mecca for pilots

>>> Back to post index <<<

2006/09/17 Bought a Garmin 496
π 2006-09-17 23:15 by Merlin in Flying

I was reading some NTSB reports (i.e. plane accident reports), and read about yet another instance when a plane had been vectored into a mountain, or a plane heading right for a mountain in VFR but with quite poor visibility, never got a call from the air controller who got collision alerts on his radar, because the controller felt the pilot didn't need the help because he was flying VFR (that turned out to be incorrect, but his call cost several lifes).
Anyway, I came to the conclusion that since I had decided that I was going to get my instrument rating (IFR), I would not want to rely on just a few old instruments in the plane, and a controller who after all is human, and could make a fatal mistake one day. It did not seem to make sense to fly without visibility, at night, or in instrument conditions, without a GPS with terrain awareness (i.e. a map showing you terrain around you that is close to your altitude, or above you)

Given that, since I was going to get some new piece of handheld equipment, I decided to go all out and just get the best available today: A Garmin 496 with XM weather. I ordered it overnight on thursday and got it on friday in time for my saturday flight to Reno.
I've then spent most of my Sunday reading the manual and playing with it.
My impressions are:

  • It's really a full IFR GPS except that because Garmin can't get it certified, it says everywhere "not for use for IFR", but it seems much better than most IFR certified GPSes out there
  • It has high resolution terrain awareness, just what I wanted
  • XM weather is quite nice. Ok, it's a $50/month XM satellite radio/weather subscription, but I think that's well worth it if it can help you avoid a mountain wave, or "controlled flight into terrain" (that you couldn't otherwise see)
  • Real Time TFR information is even better. Nowadays, TFRs can pop up anywhere, even while you are in flight, and you are somehow responsible for avoiding all of them. Graphical TFR zones that show up on my moveable map screen just seem essential. Now, if you're sold on that, try up to date AIRMETs, and SIGMETs. That too, is essential in my opinion.
  • XM radio is a nice added touch. I didn't have XM radio at home, and now I do :)
  • It's also a very good car GPS, and even a marine GPS with sonar capability.
  • My first down point on it is that you can't use its internal memory to upload new maps. You have to buy some custom Garmin memory that is huge in size and price. They really should have used an existing format like CF or SD/MMC
  • My other problem with it is that the connectivity it's supposed to have with other Garmin equipment that's already in planes, is effectively useless: you need an aviation shop to do custom wiring work beforehand, which means that as a renter, you can't hope to use TIS (which would have been useful), or exchange data with other avionics inside the plane (A Garmin guy told me that the FAA prevents them from uploading a route or flightplan to an IFR GPS anyway, because their equipment isn't IFR certified, so it can't upload data to IFR equipment. Swell...)

In a nutshell, while it's not cheap, neither is renting a glass cockpit equipped aircraft, and flying with a Garmin 496 comes close, but you can do it in an older plane with antiquated avionics that you can then proceed to mostly ignore.



Unfortunately, the GPS doesn't have RAIM, but still has very good accuracy through tracking up to 12 satellites. I guess you just have to be careful to have a track on enough satellites + WAAS to know that you are getting reliable position data


Two essential features for me were real time TFR info, as well as terrain awareness when you can't see what's around you


Winds are both essential to know which altitude you'll get the best winds at, but also when you're thinking about crossing a mountain ridge


If you lose your instruments, a GPS derived backup might still come in handy


It's not a Garmin 1000 (for one it won't talk to your autopilot), but it gets close


More pages: April 2017 January 2017 December 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 September 2014 August 2014 June 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 January 2012 November 2011 August 2011 July 2011 April 2011 March 2011 November 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 May 2010 March 2010 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 April 2008 December 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 December 2004 September 2004 August 2004 May 2004 March 1999

>>> Back to post index <<<